Democratic Centralism in Practice and Idea: A critical evaluation

166968585450272133-S. Nappalos

The terrain is changing beneath our feet. Since the collapse of the majority of the “official Communist” regimes, the world has witnessed both events and ideas that have undermined the former dominant thinking within the left. The Zapatistas, Argentina in 2001, South Korean workers movements, Oaxaca in 2006, the struggles around anti-globalization, and Greece’s series of insurrectionary moments have increasingly presented challenges to traditional left answers to movements and organization. In previous eras Marxist-Leninism was the nexus which all currents by default had to respond to either in agreement or critique. Today, increasingly anarchist practices and theory have come to play this role.

As a member of an anarchist political organization, a friend once told me I in fact was practicing democratic centralism. This was perplexing, because the group had no resembling structures, practices, or the associated behaviors of democratic centralism. However, I was told that since we debated, came to common decisions, and acted on that collective democracy, we were in fact democratic centralist. This kind of productive confusion led to questions about the concept, and why the target of democratic centralism has shifted. This move, the shifting conceptual territory of core concepts of a certain orthodoxy, comes up repeatedly not only with democratic centralism, but also surrounding ideas like crisis, dialectics, the State, and class. The resulting cognitive dissonance caused me to investigate attempts at reinvigorating the concept of democratic centralism (democratic centralist revisionism), and understand truly what it is, where it came from, and how it has been practiced. Continue reading

From Theory to Practice, Taking a Critical Look at Leninism

lenin1This is a piece we’re sharing originally posted to Machete 408 by Adam Weaver. It is a review/summation piece is being released in conjunction with a forthcoming piece by Scott Nappolas which presents an extensive discussion of Lenin’s concept of democratic centralism. (soon to be linked)

From Theory to Practice, Taking a Critical Look at Leninism

A Look At Leninism by Ron Taber. 104 pp. New York , New York : Aspect Foundation, 1988

Where can those looking for a critical understanding of Lenin turn? How can we better understand how the Russian Revolution begin as the first modern anti-capitalist revolution from below with workers taking over and running their workplaces, peasants seizing the land, and the creation of democratic soviets (worker committees)? And then in less than a decade its devolution into the brutal dictatorship of Stalin? Is there a continuity between the ideas of Lenin and his particular brand of Marxism that reshaped the Marxist movement in the 1920’s and the number of revolutionary parties that would later achieve state power and claim the Bolshevik party and Lenin as their model and inspiration?

Little known and barely circulated now over two decades since publication in 1988, A Look At Lenin by Ron Taber is perhaps the only systematic and thorough critique of Leninism as examined through the writings and work of Lenin and the Bolshevik party. For this reason it has been a favorite of mine since I picked it up as a teenage reader of the late Love and Rage magazine. When I came across the book I was someone struggling with and questioning my relationship with anarchism at the time and looking in other directions such as the Leninist tradition. While Taber’s piece did not answer many of the larger political questions I was grappling with at the time (no matter where I’m at politically I don’t think that itch will ever go away), it did help me think deeper about Leninism as a tradition as well as with understanding better the problems I saw in many Leninist inspired political organizations that I was beginning to come into contact with at the time. Continue reading

MAS 2013 International Women’s Day Statement

7-Female_RMG_sitdown_demo_0

Today we celebrate International Women’s Day.  The history of International Women’s Day dates back to the struggles of working women in the United States and Russia in the early 20th century.   Although many advances have been made since this time in fighting against gender oppression, patriarchy not only still exists but fundamentally influences every aspect of our lives.  The fight against patriarchy in all of its forms is a central part of any true struggle for revolutionary change; and it is integrally linked to the struggle against capitalism, the state and all other forms of oppression.  The struggle against gender oppression is not about women gaining access to, and utilizing, the positions and tools of oppression that have been used to oppress them; the struggle is a struggle to abolish these positions and tools of oppression in order to liberate both the oppressed, as well as those benefiting- however unhealthily- from oppression.  The struggle has developed, identifying more sources of gender oppression rooted in an all-pervasive and intersectionally-linked patriarchal system.  Just some of these fronts of struggle include confronting the gender binary system, essentialization of roles and expectations, disempowering socialization processes, repressive dominant cultural mores, elite control of the body, objectification and commodification of the body, gender restrictions around sexual practices, and so much more.  However, it is essential to remember that development of these early struggles of working women does not and should not mean development away from such struggles.  In the United States and around the world the centrality of the struggle against capitalism and other forms of oppression to the struggle against gender oppression remains fundamental to a truly liberatory movement against patriarchy. So on this International Women’s Day, we stand in solidarity as, and with, the gender oppressed and the many global struggles that centrally challenge the various forms of patriarchy in our lives as part of a broad movement against capitalism, the state and all forms of oppression!

Building Power and Advancing: For Reforms, Not Reformism

4361288370_9847ef4023_zBy Thomas (Miami Autonomy & Solidarity)

“We shall carry out all possible reforms in the spirit in which an army advances ever forwards by snatching the enemy-occupied territory in its path.” – Errico Malatesta[i]

As anarchist communists, we are against reformism.  However, we are for reforms.  We believe that fundamentally the entire system of capitalism, the state and all systems of hierarchy, domination, oppression and exploitation of humans over humans must be abolished and replaced with a direct democracy, egalitarian social relations and a classless economy that bases contribution according to ability and distribution according to need.  However, such a social revolution can only occur through the power of the popular classes themselves from the bottom-up.  In advancing towards such a social revolution and a free and equal society, we must build our power in preparation for this fundamental transformation of the world, building on struggles along the way.  Ultimately our demands will be too threatening to the elite classes for them to bear; and their resistance to our drive for freedom will be too much for us to tolerate any longer. Continue reading

Movimientos y Organización: una entrevista a Lucha Común por Comité Editorial Acción Libertaria

MAS gustaría presentarles esta entrevista de un miembro de la organización anarquista Lucha Común (EE.UU.) por Comité Editorial Acción Libertaria en Bogotá. ¡Disfrúta!

Con el ánimo de establecer y fortalecer las relaciones con organizaciones libertarias internacionales, hemos realizado la siguiente entrevista al compañero Antonio, militante de la organización política Lucha Común, una federación anarquista con varios años de experiencia en los Estados Unidos, cuyas reflexiones sobre la inserción de las ideas libertaria en el mundo social constituyen un valioso aporte para la consolidación del movimiento anarquista en el territorio colombiano.

ACCIÓN LIBERTARIA: ¿Qué es Lucha Común?
LUCHA COMÚN: Es una organización anarquista revolucionaria que tuvo su inicio en el año 2000, en respuesta a las olas de protestas masivas en contra de la globalización neoliberal, con el nombre de Federación Comunista Libertaria del Noreste (NEFAC). En aquel entonces se unieron varios colectivos comunistas libertarios con el propósito de crear una organización anarquista revolucionaria que se enfocara en participar y agitar en las luchas sociales del noreste de América del Norte, incluyendo los Estados Unidos y Canadá. Por razones estratégicas nos separamos en distintas organizaciones. Ahora existe la Unión Comunista Libertaria en Quebec, Canadá y la Federación Comunista Libertaria- Lucha Común en los EEUU. Actualmente hay cuatro grupos federados en los tres estados de Massachusetts, Nueva York y Rhode Island. Además hay varias militantes particulares en Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Nueva Jersey, Pennsylvania, Vermont y Virginia.

AL: ¿Cómo entiende el anarquismo Lucha Común?
LC: Entendemos el anarquismo como una crítica del dominio de un grupo o persona sobre las demás. Eso incluye el dominio económico del capitalismo, pero también el dominio del Estado, el patriarcado, el imperialismo y la supremacía blanca.

AL: Sabemos que sus apuestas están dirigidas al estudio y desarrollo teórico, a la propaganda del anarquismo y a la inserción en las luchas populares ¿cómo han desarrollado este trabajo?

Imagen Continue reading

Foxes and Henhouses: Austerity and the false dance of healthcare fraud

fraud9n-5-web-SN Nappalos

Healthcare fraud is a big deal. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) estimates that tax payers are on the hook for around $80 billion per year of fraud.[1] In 2011, the FBI had a record year retrieving $4.1 billion from fraudulent practitioners and businesses.[2] The Department of Health and Human Services discuss, in their 2011 annual Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program Annual Report, the fact that the Affordable Care and Patient Protection Act adds new measures, money, and efforts to combat the pervasive fraud that plagues our health care system. Our system that is that mixes profit and personal gain at each step of the industry.[3] Florida is a crucible because of the combination of vast wealth, poverty, and abuse.

The FBI calls South Florida specifically as “ground zero for the multi-billion-dollar criminal industry of health care fraud”.[4] Miami-Dade county itself has wide gaps between the rich and poor, and contains cities that have both the highest and lowest rates of people with healthcare coverage in the nation. Florida itself has low insurance coverage at nearly 20% of the state without any coverage at all (ignoring those who have only nominal coverage).[5] Clearly this environment contributes to the vast abuse of Medicare and Medicaid money centered in South Florida.

It is in this context that the Palm Beach Post reports the loss of federal anti-fraud money by Florida.[6] Large cuts to the Florida Medicaid anti-fraud body disqualified the state from additional assistance normally given by the federal government through matching funds. When fraud is at an all time high, and South Florida is the capital of healthcare fraud in the country, dozens of positions are held unfilled, budgets are being slashed, and key projects unfunded.

It’s worth reflecting on the fact that similar arguments are made against public safety net programs like Medicare and Medicaid because of fraud as well as for calls to cut the programs. These austerity measures come down to targeting programs aimed at the most vulnerable elements of society (disproportionately women, children, oppressed minorities, and the working class) for which there are no alternatives that could pick up the slack. There simply is no profit to drive private sector solutions for people who can’t pay. While the ruling powers push ideas that in effect come down to large decreases in the basic standard of living for Americans, the implementation is contradictory. We see here that the attack is across the board including fraud units, which would in theory help reduce the burden on public money. Austerity measures are being forced onto programs which both harm society as a whole as well as cripple the agencies.

With fraud there is an alternative. Driven by both poverty and an incentive to profiteer off a system in which the public is on the hook for private gain, our healthcare system is fraud infested. The answer is to remove the fundamental forces that drive fraud. Healthcare employees and businesses should be payed to provide services to the community as a whole, without receiving financial incentives to provide additional services (a situation which also drives unnecessary procedures, lengthy hospital stays, and abuse). Likewise, the companies that leech the bulk of profit from the system (in terms of manipulating patents, inflating the cost of drugs and machinery, and wasting billions on advertising) should be capped. For decades science has been driven by diligent researchers working to advance their fields, rather than the drive to quick profits which churns out situations like companies re-patenting drugs available for 50 years in new delivery systems. Lastly, we need to take the power to call the shots out of the hands of politicians, business leaders, and the powerful. As long as people stand to benefit from these decisions, they will continue to use the system for their own personal advancement. The community should have the power to decide how money will be spent on who, and what type of care they will receive. That will take a fight where people need to join together and impose democracy onto a corrupt and authoritarian system.

Post script: Since this article was written, the Governor has announced a budget with further cuts to medicaid as well as rejecting the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act that would bring additional federal money for additional Medicaid coverage.


Normal Means

This story comes to us from MAS member SN Nappalos about experiences working in healthcare. –

Fabiola closed her eyes. On the television, a preacher spoke a prayer while the patient rested quietly in the bed. That day Fabiola was fired, or terminated as management called it.

The supervisor crept in quietly, and reported finding Fabiola with her eyes closed. He found a witness and returned to see her standing at the sink, the patient still asleep. Security guards entered the room shortly, and she was escorted from the building. Continue reading